Aplicación de técnicas de correlación de anomalías geofísicas al Noreste de la Península de Yucatán

Main Article Content

T. Gonzáles-Moran
V. Suro Pérez

Abstract

The ambiguity in the geological interpretation of gravity and magnetic anomalies may be reduced by correlation of both signals. These techniques are based upon the assumption that the variations in lithology and physical properties of the crystalline crust are due to variations in the mineralogy of the rocks. Such variations control the density and magnetite content that cause the anomalies.
In the present paper, the results of the processing of the information from lines 5 and 6 of the project IDOE (International Decade of Ocean Exploration) are show. The data was collected from the north-eastern region of the Yucatan Peninsula in the Caribean Sea. A quantitative comparison between the first vertical derivative of the gravity anomaly and the total magnetic intensity reduced to the pole by means of the Poisson Theorem is made. 
Both gravity and magnetic anomalies show a pattern parallel to the coast. Furthermore, the analysis shows the presence of a ride with orientation NE-SW. This could have been caused by regional faulting which produced a graben, whose edges are marked by the Island of Cozumel and the Arrowsmith Bank.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gonzáles-Moran, T., & Suro Pérez, V. (1980). Aplicación de técnicas de correlación de anomalías geofísicas al Noreste de la Península de Yucatán . Geofisica Internacional, 19(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.1980.19.4.916
Section
Article

References

BAIE, L., 1970. Possible structural link between Yucatan and Cuba: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologist Bull., v. 54, pp. 2204-2207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1306/5D25CC7F-16C1-11D7-8645000102C1865D

BARANOV, V., 1957. A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps; seudogravimetric anomalies: Geophysics, v. 22, pp. 359-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438369

BARANOV, V., y H. NAUDY, 1964. Numerical calculation of the formula of reduction to the magnetic pole: Geophysics, v. 29, pp. 67-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439334

CHADLER, V. W., J. S. KOSKI, L. W. BRAILE and W. J. HINZE, 1977. Utility of correlation techniques in gravity and magnetic interpretation: Goddard Space Flight Center. Final Report of NASA Contract No. NASA-22816.

DENGO, G. y O. BOHNENBERGER, 1969. Structural development of northern Central America and western Caribbean: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Mem. 11, pp. 203-220.

FREELAND, G. L. y R. S. DIETZ, 1971. Plate tectonic evolution of Caribbean Gulf of Mexico region: Nature, v. 232, pp. 20-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/232020a0

MALFAIT, B. T. y M. DINKELMAN, 1972. Circum-Caribbean tectonic and igneous activity and the evolution of Caribbean Plate: Geol. Soc. America Bull, v. 83, pp. 251-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1972)83[251:CTAIAA]2.0.CO;2

MOORE, W. G. y L. DEL CASTILLO, 1974. Tectonic evolution of the southern of the Gulf of Mexico: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 85, pp. 607-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1974)85<607:TEOTSG>2.0.CO;2

NABIGHIAN, M. N., 1972. The analytical signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with poligonal cross-section; its properties and use for automatic anomaly interpretation: Geophysics, v. 37, pp. 507-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440276

NEMEC, C. M., 1980. A two-phase model for the tectonic evolution of the Caribbean: 9a. Conf. Geol. del Caribe. República Dominicana. Abstract pp. 54.

SHUEY, R. T., 1972. Application of Hilbert transform to magnetic profiles: Geophysics, v. 37, pp. 1043-1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440313

SKEELS, D. C., 1947. Ambiguity in gravity interpretations: Geophysics, v. 12, pp. 43-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437295

WALPER, L. J., 1980. Geological evolution of the Greater Antilles, 9a. Conf. Geol. del Caribe. Republica Dominicana. Abstract. pp. 77.