Remanent magnetism of some modern bricks and a brick kiln-implications for archaeomagnetic work

Main Article Content

J. Urrutia Fucugauchi

Abstract

Kilns for making bricks and pottery constitute common remains of ancient activities, and as such they represent valuable objects for archaeological work. Techniques based on the study of remanent magnetism of bricks, pottery and baked soil can provide a means for datation and correlation of these remains. A study of a modern brick kiln is here presented. It is found that these materials are reliable recorders of the direction of ambient Earth's magnetic field at the time of heating-cooling. There are however some potential sources of error, since temperature measurements indicate strong gradients, with places at less than 40°/o the central temperature of the kiln. There, the remanence is a partial-thermoremanent magnetization, and its use·for archaeointensity determinations could lead to errors. The directions of remanent magnetism from all places sampled reproduced within the statistical uncertainties of the technique the observed geomagnetic field direction.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
2%
33%
Days to publication 
14925
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Geofísica Internacional

Article Details

How to Cite
Urrutia Fucugauchi, J. (1981). Remanent magnetism of some modern bricks and a brick kiln-implications for archaeomagnetic work. Geofisica Internacional, 20(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.1981.20.4.904
Section
Article

References

AITKEN, M. J., 1961. Physics and archaeology, Interscience, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3057283

COX, A., 1969. Confidence limits for the precision parameter K, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 18, 545-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1969.tb00257.x

DESA, A. and J. W. WIDDOWSON, 1974. A digitally controlled AF demagnetizer for peak field up to 0.1 tesla, J. Phys. E., 7, 266-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3735/8/4/019

FISHER, R. A., 1953. Dispersion on a Sphere, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A217, 295-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1953.0064

FOLGHERAITER, G., 1899. Sur les variations séculaires d'inclinaison magnétique dans l'antiquité, Arch. Sci Phys. Nat., 8, 5-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/jphystap:018990080066001

IRVING, E., 1964. Palaeomagnetism and its application to geological and geophysical problems, Wiley, N. Y., 399 p.

KONO, M. and H. TANAKA, 1977. Influence of partial pressure of oxygen on thermoremanent magnetization of basalts, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 13, 276-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(77)90111-X

McELHINNY, M. W., 1973. Palaeomagnetism and plate tectonics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 358 pp.

MOLYNEUX, L., 1971. A complete result magnetometer for measuring the remanent magnetization of rocks, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 24, 429-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1971.tb02188.x

PULLAIAH, G., E. IRVING, K. L. BUCHAN and D. J. DUNLOP, 1975. Magnetization changes caused by burial and uplift, Earth Planet. Sci Lett., 28, 133-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(75)90221-6

SHAW, J., 1974. A new method of determining the magnitude of the palaeomagnetic field. Application to five historic lavas and five archaeological samples, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 39, 133-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1974.tb05443.x

SMITH, B. M. and M. PREVOT, 1976. Variation of the magnetic properties in a basaltic dyke with concentric cooling zones, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 14, 120-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(77)90149-2

STEPHENSON, A., 1967. Apparatus for thermal demagnetization by the progressive method. In: Collinson, D. W., Creer, IM. and Runcorn, S.K. (Eds.), Methods in Palaeomagnetism, Elsevier, 296-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-2894-5.50051-3

TARLING, D. H., 1971. Principles and applications of palaeomagnetism, Chapman and Hall, London, 164 p.

THELLIER, E. and 0. THELLIER, 1959. Sur l'intensité du champ magnétique terrrestre dans le passé historique et géologique, Ann. Geophys., 15, 285-376.

URRUTIA-FUCUGAUCHI, J., 1975. Investigaciones paleomagnéticas y arqueomagnéticas en México, Anales del Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM, 21, 109-134.

URRUTIA-FUCUGAUCHI, J., 1976. Estudio paleomagnético de rocas ígneas del noreste del Estado de Jalisco, México, Tesis Maestría en Ciencias, UNAM, 293 p.

URRUTIA-FUCUGAUCHI, J., 1979. Paleointensity determinations and the remanence intensity and susceptibility distributions, Anales del Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM, 25, 95-100.

URRUTIA-FUCUGAUCHI, J., 1980a. Further reliability tests for determination of paleointensities of the Earth's magnetic field, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 61, 243-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1980.tb04315.x

URRUTIA-FUCUGAUCHI, J., 1980b. Palaeointensity determination and K-Ar dating of the Tertiary Northeast Jalisco Volcanics (Mexico), Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 63, 601-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1980.tb02641.x

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>