Page 11 - Demo

Tania Karen Espinoza-Ju%u00e1rez et al. | 2081Table 3. Density and magnetic susceptibility ranges for various rocks and mineralsDensity (g/cm3) Magnetic Susceptibility x103 (SI)MineralsSphalerite 3.5 %u2013 4 0.7Chalcopyrite 4.1 %u2013 4.3 0.4Pyrrhotite 4.5 %u2013 4.8 1500Pyrite 4.9 %u2013 5.2 (0.005 %u2013 5) 1.5Arsenopyrite 5.9 %u2013 6.2 2.5Kaolinite 2.2 %u2013 2.63Gypsum 2.2 %u2013 2.6 -0.01Calcite 2.6 %u2013 2.7 -0.001 - -0.01Quartz 2.5 %u2013 2.7 -0.01RocksAcid igneous 2.3 %u2013 3.11 0 %u2013 80Granite 2.5 %u2013 2.81 2.5Shale 1.77 %u2013 3.2 0.6Limestone 1.93 %u2013 2.9 0.3Dolomite 2.28 %u2013 2.9 0.1Sedimentary rocks 2.5 0.9Metamorphic rocks 2.4 %u2013 3.1 4.2* Data sourced from Telford et al., 1990.Figure 8. Three-dimensional models created from Polygon 1 and Polygon 2. To the right is the locational map of highly dense bodies (isosurface 1) linked to granitic intrusive bodies 1 and 2. Together it shows mineralization (isosurface 2) linked to orogenic faults (Servicio Geol%u00f3gico Mexicano, 2002).Mag. Susc. Density (SI) (gr/cm3) 0.073 Mag. Susc. (SI) 0.000076 0.000004 o -0.000006 -0.00028 2410 %u00b73084 2240 Symbology Polygon 1 (Ply 1) c::::J Polygon 2 (Ply 2) -lsosurface 1 (0.0002 - 0.0078 gr/cm 3) -lsosurface 2 (0.00001- 0.0024 SI) ~ Mines -< %u25a1 Sampling points Resampling points for 3D interpolation Fault (INEGI, 2010) Topographic Elevation (m.s.n.m.) 11 1111111 1542 1901 2316 460000 X