Page 9 - Demo

Tania Karen Espinoza-Ju%u00e1rez et al. | 2079Figure 5. a) Topography (GMRT) in Zimap%u00e1n, Hidalgo (Ryan et al., 2009). Depiction of relief, faults, mines and groundwater extraction wells. b) Map of the Simple Bouguer Anomaly with vertical derivative in Zimap%u00e1n, Hidalgo.Figure 6. a) Magnetic Anomaly Map with Pole Reduction. b) Map of the first derivative in %u201cx%u201d with Pole Reduction of the residual effect on the Magnetic Anomaly. Rosette illustrates the preferred orientation of the NW-SE lineaments.the center of this domain, the El Morro formation is present, which holds significant economic value due to the presence of valuable minerals. It is a polymictic conglomerate composed of limestone pieces, andesites, and a calcareous matrix containing quartz, feldspar, and mica (L%u00f3pez, 2008).AMD III (0.002 to 0.007 nT/m): It is formed by a contrast of very high and low values of the analytical signal. Intrusive igneous rocks of granodioritic composition are present, containing minerals such as quartz, sodium plagioclase, potassium feldspar, hornblende, biotite, sphene, apatite, and zircon (L%u00f3pez, 2008). Nonetheless, there exist interactions between these crystalline entities and sedimentary formations; however, in contrast to AMD II, the surrounding environment is primarily volcanic, as it shares the same chemistry as plutonism.+ m -99%u00b045' -99%u00ba30' -99%u00ba00' + Symbology Zimap%u00e1n region Faults (INEGI, 201 O) m mGal Faults (SGM, 2002) 0.011 0.004 ~ Mines 0.003 0.003 %u2022 Sampling points 0.002 1997 0.002 Limits of the lula River 1941 0.001 Basin 1900 0.001 Limits of the Moctezuma 1865 0.001 River Basin 1831 1793 -0.001 1749 -0.001 1699 1637 -0.004 -0.006 Scale 1 350000 Scale 1 350000 -0.034 ... ... ,0000 , ... Topographic map ... ... ,0000 , ... Bouguer anomaly with dZ (melers) (Zimap%u00e1n, Hidalgo) (mete,s) (Zimap%u00e1n, Hidalgo) -1111!'1\-mt,l!l:1.1111,1mw,., El -99%u00b045' + m .99%u202245%u2022 Symbology -~- Zimap%u00e1n region Faults (INEGI, 2010) Faults (SGM, 2002) nT nT/m 875.5 Guidelines 43.3 0.013 ~ Mines 2.0 0.008 -21.3 0.006 %u2022 Sampling points -35.6 0.004 Limits of the Tula River -46.7 0.003 Basin 0.002 0.001 - Limits of the Moctezuma 0.000 Rlver Basin 0.000 -0.000 -0.001 -0.001 -0.002 -0.003 420000N -0.004 .99%u202245%u2022 -99\-0.005 Sea le 1 :350000 Magnetic Anomaly Map with Scale 1 :350000 -0.007 ... ... ,0000 , ... \o Map of first derivative in X Pole Reduction liZ'M::- (Zimap%u00e1n, Hidalgo) (met~s) (Zimap%u00e1n, Hidalgo) (mtWI) -0.021 -\.. u,,;,,,,,r'11':,%u00abif/V,M-l<1,