Tropospheric Correction using PyAPS in the West Region of Venezuela

Contenido principal del artículo

Gabriela Quintana
Carlos Eduardo Reinoza Gómez
Fikret Dogru
Gareth Funning
Franck Audemard

Resumen

La subsidencia de la Costa Oriental del Lago de Maracaibo (COLM) en el estado Zulia, Venezuela, es un evento geológico de causa antrópica con casi un siglo de existencia. Se buscó conocer el estado actual de este evento mediante el uso de la técnica de Interferometría de Radar de Apertura Sintética (InSAR); para ello, se enfatizó la necesidad de mitigar los retrasos atmosféricos en los datos, por lo que se aplicó el modelo climático ERA5 con PyAPS. Esto con el fin de obtener mediciones precisas de la subsidencia en tres campos petroleros ubicados en la COLM (Tía Juana, Lagunillas y Bachaquero), cuyo proceso de subsidencia acumulada es de aproximadamente 5 metros entre 1926 y 1986. Para este estudio, se estimaron los valores de subsidencia para el período de 2018 a 2020 utilizando un conjunto de datos de 157 imágenes interferométricas de Sentinel-1 (79 de órbitas ascendentes y 78 de órbitas descendentes), lo que permitió calcular los valores de desplazamiento a lo largo de la línea de visión (LOS) para ambas órbitas, los valores de la contribución del retraso troposférico y los valores de las componentes este-oeste y vertical, extraídos de píxeles representativos con alta coherencia y con promedio espacial y temporal, habiendo reducido la componente de ruido aleatorio. Se obtuvieron valores de desplazamiento para los campos de Tía Juana, Lagunillas y Bachaquero, respectivamente, de: -6.4 +/- 0.8 cm/año, -7.9 +/- 1.0 cm/año y -7.1 +/- 0.8 cm/año para el modo ascendente; y de 1.2 +/- 0.5 cm/año, -4.1 +/- 0.5 cm/año y -1.8 +/- 0.3 cm/año para el modo descendente. Asimismo, mediante la selección de píxeles representativos, se estimaron valores confiables para la contribución del retraso troposférico, obteniendo: -0.2 cm/año y -0.6 cm/año; -0.3 cm/año y -0.5 cm/año y; -0.4 cm/año y -0.5 cm/año. Por último, las componentes este-oeste (dE) y vertical (dU) para los tres campos fueron de: -6.79 cm/año y -2.94 cm/año; -3.27 cm/año y -5.19 cm/año; y -5.92 cm/año y -6.29 cm/año, respectivamente, minimizando el riesgo de que los errores de proyección geométrica amplifiquen el ruido subyacente.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Quintana, G., Reinoza Gómez, C. E., Dogru, F., Funning, G., & Audemard, F. (2026). Tropospheric Correction using PyAPS in the West Region of Venezuela. Geofísica Internacional, 65(3), 2339–2355. https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.2954436xe.2026.65.3.1930
Sección
Artículo
Biografía del autor/a

Carlos Eduardo Reinoza Gómez, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE), Baja California, México

Investigador y profesor en CICESE

Citas

Agram, P. S., Jolivet, R., Riel, B., Lin, Y. N., Simons, M., Hetland, E., Doin, M.-P., & Lasserre, C. (2013). New radar interferometric time series analysis toolbox released. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 94(7), 69–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO070001

Albino, F., Biggs, J., Yu, C., & Li, Z. (2020). Automated methods for detecting volcanic deformation using Sentinel-1 InSAR time series illustrated by the 2017–2018 unrest at Agung, Indonesia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(2), e2019JB017908. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017908

Arenas, I., Hernández, B., Royero, G., Cioce, V., & Wildermann, E. (2019). Detection of subsidence due to the effect of oil extraction applying the DInSAR technique in Venezuela. Revista Mapping, 28(195), 18-26. https://ojs.revistamapping.com/MAPPING/article/view/204/67

Audemard, F. A., Machette, M. N., Cox, J. W., Dart, R. L., & Haller, K. M. (2000). Map and database of Quaternary faults in Venezuela and offshore regions (Open-File Report 2000-018). U. S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr0018

Berardino, P., Fornaro, G., Lanari, R., & Sansosti, E. (2002). A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(11), 2375–2383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.803792

Biggs, J., & Wright, T. J. (2020). How satellite InSAR has grown from opportunistic science to routine monitoring over the last decade. Nature Communications, (11), 3863. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17587-6

Brencher, G., Henderson, S. T., & Shean, D. E. (2025). Removing atmospheric noise from InSAR interferograms in mountainous regions with a convolutional neural network. Computers & Geosciences, 194, 105771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105771

Cao, Y., Jónsson, S., & Li, Z. (2021). Advanced InSAR tropospheric corrections from global atmospheric models that incorporate spatial stochastic properties of the troposphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(5), e2020JB020952. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020952

Chen, C., Dai, K., Tang, X., Cheng, J., Pirasteh, S., Wu, M., Shi, X., Zhou, H., & Li, Z. (2022). Removing InSAR topography-dependent atmospheric effect based on deep learning. Remote Sensing, 14(17), 4171. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174171

Chen, H., Shen, Y., Zhang, L., Liang, H., Feng, T., & Song, X. (2025). Mitigation of tropospheric turbulent delays in InSAR time series by incorporating a stochastic process. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 222, 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.02.028

Deguchi, T., & Narita, T. (2015). Monitoring of land deformation due to oil production by InSAR time series analysis using PALSAR data in Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. In Proceedings of FRINGE'15: Advances in SAR Interferometry and Sentinel-1 InSAR Workshop (ESA Publication SP-731). European Space Agency. https://doi.org/10.5270/Fringe2015

Doğru, F. (2020). The importance of atmospheric corrections on InSAR surveys over Turkey: Case study of tectonic deformation of Bodrum-Kos earthquake. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 177, 5761–5780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02606-w

Doğru, F., Albino, F., & Biggs, J. (2023). Weather model based atmospheric corrections of Sentinel-1 InSAR deformation data at Turkish volcanoes. Geophysical Journal International, 234(1), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad070

European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. (s.f.). ECMWF Reanalysis v5. https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/ecmwf-reanalysis-v5

Ferretti, A., Prati, C., & Rocca, F. (2001). Permanent Scatterers in SAR Interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(1), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.898661

Fialko, Y., Simons, M., & Agnew, D. (2001). The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 MW7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(16), 3063–3066. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013174

González, P. J. (2024). Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR). En E. Chaussard, C. Jones, J. A. Jenn, A. Donnellan. (Eds.), Remote sensing for characterization of geohazards and natural resources (pp. 53-70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59306-2_3

Gray, A. L., Mattar, K. E., & Sofko, G. (2000). Influence of ionospheric electron density fluctuations on satellite radar interferometry. Geophysical Research Letters, 27(10), 1451–1454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL000016

Hamzaoui, Y., Civera, M., Miano, A., Bonano, M., Fabbrocino, F., Prota, A., & Chiaia, B. (2025). Hierarchical Clustering and Small Baseline Subset Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SBAS-DInSAR) for Remotely Sensed Building Identification and Risk Prioritisation. Remote Sensing, 17(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010128

Hanssen, R. F. (2001). Radar interferometry: Data interpretation and error analysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47633-9

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., ... Thépaut, J.-N. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(730), 1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803

Hogenson, K., Kristenson, H., Kennedy, J., Johnston, A., Rine, J., Logan, T., Zhu, J., Williams, F., Herrmann, J., Smale, J., & Meyer, F. (2020). Hybrid Pluggable Processing Pipeline (HyP3): A cloud-native infrastructure for generic processing of SAR data [Software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4646138

Hu, Z., & Mallorquí, J. J. (2019). An accurate method to correct atmospheric phase delay for InSAR with the ERA5 global atmospheric model. Remote Sensing, 11(17), 1969. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11171969

Jolivet, R., Grandin, R., Lasserre, C., Doin, M. P., & Peltzer, G. (2011). Systematic InSAR tropospheric phase delay corrections from global meteorological reanalysis data. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(17), L17311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048757

Kinoshita, Y. (2022). Development of InSAR neutral atmospheric delay correction model by use of GNSS ZTD and its horizontal gradient. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3188988

Kirui, P., Riedel, B., & Gerke, M. (2022). Performance of numerical weather products for InSAR tropospheric correction: A case study of a tropical region. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, V-3-2022, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-115-2022

Mateus, P., Nico, G., & Catalão, J. (2015). Uncertainty assessment of the estimated atmospheric delay obtained by a numerical weather model (NMW). IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(12), 6710–6717. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2446758

Medici, C., Del Soldato, M., Fibbi, G., Bini, L., Confuorto, P., Mannori, G., Mucci, A., Pellegrineschi, V., Bianchini, S., Raspini, F., & Casagli, N. (2024). InSAR data for detection and modelling of overexploitation-induced subsidence: Application in the industrial area of Prato (Italy). Scientific Reports, 14, 17950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67725-z

Meng, L., Yan, C., Lv, S., Sun, H., Xue, S., Li, Q., Zhou, L., Edwing, D., Edwing, K., Geng, X., Wang, Y., & Yan, X-H. (2024). Synthetic aperture radar for geosciences. Reviews of Geophysics, 62(3), e2023RG000821. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023RG000821

Murria, J., & Saab, J. A. (1992). Problems and solutions in emergency planning for Western Venezuela oilfields. Paper presented at the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain. https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/10_vol10_5917.pdf

Poland, J. F., & Davis, G. H. (1969). Land subsidence due to withdrawal of fluids. En Reviews in Engineering Geology (Vol. 2, pp. 187-269). The Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/REG2-p187

Quintana, G. (2021). Estudio de las deformación de la corteza derivadas de la geodinámica a partir de la interferometría SAR (Radar de Apertura Sintética): ejemplos de aplicación (Kumamoto-Japón, Valencia y Costa Oriental del Lago de Maracaibo-Venezuela) [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Central de Venezuela].

Quintana-Sánchez, G., Audemard, F., Reinoza, C., Dogru, F., & Alvarado, L. (2025). Estudio de las deformaciones de la corteza derivadas de la geodinámica a partir de la Interferometría SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar): Aplicación a la Costa Oriental del Lago de Maracaibo-Venezuela. Revista Cartográfica, (110). https://doi.org/10.35424/rcarto.i110.5874

Sailellah, S. N., & Fukushima, Y. (2023). Comparison of tropospheric delay correction methods for InSAR analysis using a mesoscale meteorological model: A case study from Japan. Earth, Planets and Space, 75, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-023-01773-z

Ulma, T., Mutiara Anjasmara, A., & Hayati, N. (2021). Atmospheric phase delay correction of PS-InSAR to monitor land subsidence in Surabaya. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 936, 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/936/1/012033

Witkowski, W., Łucka, M., Guzy, A., Sudhaus, H., Barańska, A., & Hejmanowski, R. (2024). Impact of mining-induced seismicity on land subsidence occurrence. Remote Sensing of Environment, 301, 113934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113934

Xiao, R., Yu, C., Li, Z., & He, X. (2021). Statistical assessment metrics for InSAR atmospheric correction: Applications to generic atmospheric correction online service for InSAR (GACOS) in Eastern China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 96, 102289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102289

Yunjun, Z., Fattahi, H., & Amelung, F. (2019). Small baseline InSAR time series analysis: Unwrapping error correction and noise reduction. Computers & Geosciences, 133, 104331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104331

Zhang, Z., Feng, W., Xu, X., & Samsonov, S. (2023). Performance of common scene stacking atmospheric correction on nonlinear InSAR deformation retrieval. Remote Sensing, 15(22), 5399. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225399