Comparative study ofionogram F2 peak height from different techniques
Main Article Content
Abstract
We have carried out an intercomparison of the layer height parameters hmF2, hpF2 and hpF2[M(3000)} all deduced from h'(f) curve, in order to identify the conditions and trends, if any, under which the hmF2, according to the POLAN true height analysis, could be best represented by either of the other two parameters that are obtained empirically from simpleconsiderations. The analysis is carried out for a low-latitude and an equatorial station, for two different months, representative of local summer and equinox. The analysis shows that during nighttime hpF2 and hmF2[M(3000)] arc almost coincident and both of them give a very good estimation of hmF2 (according to the POLAN code), implying that either of them could be used to represent the F2 layer peak height within the same precision. During daytime, however, hpF2 is generally higher tha."l hmF2[M(3000)], the difference being more pronounced during December (local summer) months. It is observed that during daytime lunF2[M(3000)] overestimates hmF2 (derived using POLAN) over the equatorial station and underestimates it over the low-latitude station, while hpF2 generally overestimates it at both locations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
ABDU, M. A., G. O. WALKER, B. M. REDDY, J. H. A. SOBRAL, B. G. FEJER, T. KIKUSHI, N. B. TRIVEDI and E. P. SZUSZCZEWICZ, 1990. Electric field versus neutral wind control of the equatorial anomaly under quiet and disturbed conditions: A global perspective from Sundial 86. Ann. Geophys., 8, 419.
BRADLEY, P. A. and J. R. DUDENEY, 1973. A simple model of the vertical distribution of the electron concentration in the ionospohere. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 35, 2131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(73)90132-3
BERKEY, F. T. and G. H. STONEHOCKER, 1989. A comparison of the height of maximum electron density of the F2-layer from real height analysis and estimates based on M (3000) F2. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 51, 873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(89)90004-4
de PAULA, E. R., I. J. KANTOR and M. A. ABDU, 1981. A comparative study of the CCIR predictions with observations of foF2 and hmF2 over Brazil. Telecommunication Journal, 48, 589.
FORBES, J. M., M. CODRESCU and T. J. HALL, 1988. On the utilization of ionosonde data to analyze the latitudinal penetration of ionospheric storm effects. Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/GL015i003p00249
K. L. MILLER, D. G. TORR and P. G. RICHARDS, 1987. The effects of electric fields on measurements of meridional neutral winds in the thermosphere. Ann. Geophys., 5, 337.
PAUL, A. K., 1967. Ionospheric electron density profiles with continuous gradients and underlying ionization correction I. The mathematical physical problem of real-height determination from ionograms. Radio Sci., 2, 1127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rds19672101127
PIGGOTT, W. R. and K. RAWER, 1978. URSI Handbook of ionogram interpretation·and reduction. US Department of Commerce, Report UAG-23A, WDCA.
SHIMAZAKI, T., 1955. World-wide daily variation in the height of the maximum electron density of the ionospheric F2layer. J. Radio Res. Labs., Japan, 2, 85.
TITHERIDGE, J. E., 1985. Ionogram analysis with the generalised program POLAN, US Department of Commerce. Report UAG-93, WDCA.