Euler-Poincaré Characteristic and Invasion Percolation for Critical Radius Determination: A Systematic Comparison in Synthetic Porous Structures
Main Article Content
Abstract
Critical radius (Rc ) determination in porous media is essential for permeability estimation through analytical models. This study presents the first systematic comparison of the Euler-Poincaré Characteristic (EPC) method and queue-based Invasion Percolation (QBIP) algorithm using four synthetic porous structures (SPS) with controlled geometry and topology to determine Rc . QBIP demonstrated universal applicability, determining Rc = 0.09 – 0.15 μm across all SPS. EPC required negative initial connectivity for its application; positive values prevented zero-crossing identification, and while the derivative criterion detected pore size distribution (PSD) transitions, these do not correspond to percolation thresholds in disconnected structures. Deviations from design modal radii ranged from 0 – 70% for EPC and 6.7 – 50% for QBIP; no single criterion was uniformly superior. Despite morphological operations altering the initial PSD to accomplish the target porosity in SPS generation, both methods identified Rc within
the same order of magnitude as the design modes (0.10 – 0.15 μm). These findings demonstrate that EPC and QBIP provide complementary insights: EPC reveals topological transitions while QBIP captures invasion physics, enabling geometric, topological, and capillary characterization of porous media. This dual-method approach provides quantitative criteria for the selection of the method based on sample connectivity and enables cross-validation to reduce uncertainty in Rc determination for use in analytical permeability models.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Aguilar-Madera, C. G., Flores-Cano, J. V., Matías-Pérez, V., Briones-Carrillo, J. A., & Velasco-Tapia, F. (2020). Computing the permeability and Forchheimer tensor of porous rocks via closure problems and digital images. Advances in Water Resources, 142, 103616. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103616
Ahmed, U., Crary, S. F., & Coates, G. R. (1991). Permeability estimation: The various sources and their interrelationships. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 43(5), 578–587. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/19604-PA DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/19604-PA
Amann-Hildenbrand, A., Bertier, P., Busch, A., & Krooss, B. M. (2013). Experimental investigation of the sealing capacity of generic clay-rich caprocks. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 19, 620–641. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.040
Andrä, H., Combaret, N., Dvorkin, J., Glatt, E., Han, J., Kabel, M., Keehm, Y., Krzikalla, F., Lee, M., Madonna, C., Marsh, M., Mukerji, T., Saenger, E. H., Sain, R., Saxena, N., Ricker, S., Wiegmann, A., & Zhan, X. (2013a). Digital rock physics benchmarks—Part I: Imaging and segmentation. Computers & Geosciences, 50, 25–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.005
Andrä, H., Combaret, N., Dvorkin, J., Glatt, E., Han, J., Kabel, M., Keehm, Y., Krzikalla, F., Lee, M., Madonna, C., Marsh, M., Mukerji, T., Saenger, E. H., Sain, R., Saxena, N., Ricker, S., Wiegmann, A., & Zhan, X. (2013b). Digital rock physics benchmarks—part II: Computing effective properties. Computers & Geosciences, 50, 33–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.008
Armstrong, R. T., McClure, J. E., Robins, V., Liu, Z., Arns, C. H., Schlüter, S., & Berg, S. (2019). Porous media characterization using Minkowski functionals: Theories, applications and future directions. Transport in Porous Media, 130(1), 305–335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1201-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1201-4
Arns, C. H. (2004). A comparison of pore size distributions derived by NMR and X-ray-CT techniques. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 339(1), 159–165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.03.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.03.033
Arns, C., Knackstedt, M., & Martys, N. (2005). Cross-property correlations and permeability estimation in sandstone. Physical Review E, 72(4), 046304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.046304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.046304
Bernabé, Y. (1995). The transport properties of networks of cracks and pores. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B3), 4231–4241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB02986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB02986
Bernabé, Y., Li, M., & Maineult, A. (2010). Permeability and pore connectivity: A new model based on network simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 115(B10), B10203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007444
Bernabé, Y., Li, M., Tang, Y.-B., & Evans, B. (2016). Pore space connectivity and the transport properties of rocks. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles, 71(4), 50. doi: https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2015037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2015037
Blunt, M. J., Bijeljic, B., Dong, H., Gharbi, O., Iglauer, S., Mostaghimi, P., Paluszny, A., & Pentland, C. (2013). Pore-scale imaging and modelling. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 197–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.003
Bultreys, T., De Boever, W., & Cnudde, V. (2016). Imaging and image-based fluid transport modeling at the pore scale in geological materials: A practical introduction to the current state-of-the-art. Earth-Science Reviews, 155, 93–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.001
Chaniot, J., Moreaud, M., Sorbier, L., Becker, J.-M., & Fournel, T. (2022). Scalable morphological accessibility of complex microstructures. Computational Materials Science, 203, 111062. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.111062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.111062
Comisky, J. T., Newsham, K. E., Rushing, J. A., & Blasingame, T. A. (2007, November 11-14). A comparative study of capillary-pressure-based empirical models for estimating absolute permeability in tight gas sands [Paper presentation]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, CA, United States. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/110050-MS DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/110050-MS
Daigle, H. (2016). Application of critical path analysis for permeability prediction in natural porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 96, 43–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.06.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.06.016
Dastidar, R., Sondergeld, C. H., & Rai, C. S. (2007). An improved empirical permeability estimator from mercury injection for tight clastic rocks. Petrophysics, 48(3), 226-235.
Davudov, D., Moghanloo, R. G., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Interplay between pore connectivity and permeability in shale sample. International Journal of Coal Geology, 220, 103427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2020.103427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2020.103427
Franco-Villegas, M., Coconi-Morales, E., Nieto-Rivero, C. J. T., Valdiviezo-Mijangos, O. C., & Fuentes-Cruz, G. (2025). Permeability estimation using Poiseuille models: A case study on comparative analysis of characteristic radii in tight rocks. Geofísica Internacional, 64(4), 1731–1750. doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.2954436xe.2025.64.4.1877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.2954436xe.2025.64.4.1877
Ghanbarian, B., Hunt, A. G., Ewing, R. P., & Sahimi, M. (2013). Tortuosity in porous media: A critical review. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 77(5), 1461–1477. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0435
Ghomeshi, S., Kryuchkov, S., & Kantzas, A. (2018). An investigation into the effects of pore connectivity on T2 NMR relaxation. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 289, 79–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2018.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2018.02.007
Giesche, H. (2006). Mercury porosimetry: A general (practical) overview. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 23(1), 9–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.200601009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.200601009
Goral, J., & Deo, M. (2020). Nanofabrication of synthetic nanoporous geomaterials: From nanoscale-resolution 3D imaging to nano-3D-printed digital (shale) rock. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 21596. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78467-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78467-z
Gostick, J., Khan, Z., Tranter, T., Kok, M., Agnaou, M., Sadeghi, M., & Jervis, R. (2019). PoreSpy: A Python toolkit for quantitative analysis of porous media images. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(37), 1296. doi: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01296
Gostick, J. T., Misaghian, N., Irannezhad, A., & Zhao, B. (2024). A computationally efficient queue-based algorithm for simulating volume-controlled drainage under the influence of gravity on volumetric images of porous materials. Advances in Water Resources, 193, 104799. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104799
Gostick, J. T., Misaghian, N., Yang, J., & Boek, E. S. (2022). Simulating volume-controlled invasion of a non-wetting fluid in volumetric images using basic image processing tools. Computers & Geosciences, 158, 104978. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104978
Guibert, R., Horgue, P., Debenest, G., & Quintard, M. (2016). A comparison of various methods for the numerical evaluation of porous media permeability tensors from pore-scale geometry. Mathematical Geosciences, 48(3), 329–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-015-9587-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-015-9587-9
Guo, B.-E., Xiao, N., Martyushev, D., & Zhao, Z. (2024). Deep learning-based pore network generation: Numerical insights into pore geometry effects on microstructural fluid flow behaviors of unconventional resources. Energy, 294, 130990. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130990
Hildenbrand, A., Schlömer, S., & Krooss, B. M. (2002). Gas breakthrough experiments on fine‐grained sedimentary rocks. Geofluids, 2(1), 3–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-8123.2002.00031.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-8123.2002.00031.x
Hilpert, M., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in totally wetting porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 24(3), 243–255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00056-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00056-7
Hou, X., Qi, S., Guo, S., Zhang, L., Ma, L., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Li, T., & Peng, J. (2025). 3D pore structure characteristics of intact and compacted loess and their controls on hydraulic permeability. Journal of Hydrology, 663, 134126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134126
Huang, H., Li, R., Xiong, F., Hu, H., Sun, W., Jiang, Z., Chen, L., & Wu, L. (2020). A method to probe the pore-throat structure of tight reservoirs based on low-field NMR: Insights from a cylindrical pore model. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 117, 104344. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104344
Hunt, A. G. (2001). Applications of percolation theory to porous media with distributed local conductances. Advances in Water Resources, 24(3), 279–307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00058-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00058-0
Jiang, Z., Van Dijke, M. I. J., Sorbie, K. S., & Couples, G. D. (2013). Representation of multiscale heterogeneity via multiscale pore networks. Water Resources Research, 49(9), 5437–5449. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20304
Jivkov, A. P., Hollis, C., Etiese, F., McDonald, S. A., & Withers, P. J. (2013). A novel architecture for pore network modelling with applications to permeability of porous media. Journal of Hydrology, 486, 246–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.045
Kaczmarek, Ł., Wejrzanowski, T., Skibiński, J., Maksimczuk, M., & Krzyżak, A. (2017). High-resolution computed microtomography for the characterization of a diffusion tensor imaging phantom. Acta Geophysica, 65(1), 259–268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-017-0021-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-017-0021-1
Katz, A. J., & Thompson, A. H. (1986). Quantitative prediction of permeability in porous rock. Physical Review B, 34(11), 8179–8181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.8179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.8179
Katz, A. J., & Thompson, A. H. (1987). Prediction of rock electrical conductivity from mercury injection measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research, 92(B1), 599–607. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/JB092iB01p00599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/JB092iB01p00599
Kelly, S., El-Sobky, H., Torres-Verdín, C., & Balhoff, M. T. (2015). Assessing the utility of FIB-SEM images for shale digital rock physics. Advances in Water Resources, 95, 302–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.06.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.06.010
Knackstedt, M., & Paterson, L. (2009). Invasion percolation. In M. Sahimi & A. G. Hunt (Eds.), Complex media and percolation theory (pp. 175–190). Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1457-0_294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1457-0_294
León y León, C. A. (1998). New perspectives in mercury porosimetry. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 76–77, 341–372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8686(98)00052-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8686(98)00052-9
Li, B., Liu, R., & Jiang, Y. (2016). A multiple fractal model for estimating permeability of dual-porosity media. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 659–669. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.059
Luo, M., Glover, P. W. J., Zhao, P., & Li, D. (2020). 3D digital rock modeling of the fractal properties of pore structures. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 122, 104706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104706
Ma, T., Ding, M., Zhang, F., Cui, C., Cui, S., & Wang, Y. (2025). Dynamic evolution of pore structures in unconsolidated sandstone reservoir during high-rate polymer flooding. Energy & Fuels, 39(18), 8473–8481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01014
McPhee, C., Reed, J., & Zubizarreta, I. (2015). Routine core analysis. In C. McPhee, J. Reed, & I. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Core analysis: A best practice guide (pp. 181–268). Elsevier. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63533-4.00005-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63533-4.00005-6
Morales-Chávez, S., Valdez-Grijalva, M. A., Díaz-Viera, M. A., Lucas-Oliveira, E., & Bonagamba, T. J. (2025). A mathematical model of NMR transverse relaxation for pore size distribution estimation in porous media. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 379, 107922. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2025.107922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2025.107922
Mosser, L., Dubrule, O., & Blunt, M. J. (2017). Reconstruction of 3D porous media using generative adversarial neural networks. Physical Review E, 96(4), 043309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.043309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.043309
Mostaghimi, P., Blunt, M. J., & Bijeljic, B. (2013). Computations of absolute permeability on micro-CT images. Mathematical Geosciences, 45(1), 103–125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9431-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9431-4
Narsilio, G. A., Buzzi, O., Fityus, S., Yun, T. S., & Smith, D. W. (2009). Upscaling of Navier–Stokes equations in porous media: Theoretical, numerical and experimental approach. Computers and Geotechnics, 36(7), 1200–1206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.05.006
Nelson, P. H. (2009). Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales. AAPG Bulletin, 93(3), 329–340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1306/10240808059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1306/10240808059
Nishiyama, N., & Yokoyama, T. (2017). Permeability of porous media: Role of the critical pore size. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122(9), 6955–6971. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013793
Okabe, H., & Blunt, M. J. (2005). Pore space reconstruction using multiple-point statistics. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 46(1), 121–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2004.08.002] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2004.08.002
Patmonoaji, A., Tsuji, K., & Suekane, T. (2020). Pore-throat characterization of unconsolidated porous media using watershed-segmentation algorithm. Powder Technology, 362, 635–644. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.12.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.12.026
Pittman, E. D. (1992). Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection-capillary pressure curves for sandstone. AAPG Bulletin, 76(2), 191–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1306/BDFF87A4-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D DOI: https://doi.org/10.1306/BDFF87A4-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D
Quan, F., Zhang, Y., Lu, W., Wei, C., Dai, X., & Qin, Z. (2025). Multifractal characterization of full-scale pore structure in middle-high-rank coal reservoirs: Implications for permeability modeling in Western Guizhou–Eastern Yunnan Basin. Processes, 13(6), 1927. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13061927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13061927
Rabbani, A., Ayatollahi, S., Kharrat, R., & Dashti, N. (2016). Estimation of 3-D pore network coordination number of rocks from watershed segmentation of a single 2-D image. Advances in Water Resources, 94, 264–277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.05.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.05.020
Raeini, A. Q., Bijeljic, B., & Blunt, M. J. (2017). Generalized network modeling: Network extraction as a coarse-scale discretization of the void space of porous media. Physical Review E, 96(1), 013312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.013312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.013312
Rashid, F., Glover, P. W. J., Lorinczi, P., Hussein, D., Collier, R., & Lawrence, J. (2015). Permeability prediction in tight carbonate rocks using capillary pressure measurements. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 68, 536–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.10.005
Rezaee, R., Saeedi, A., & Clennell, B. (2012). Tight gas sands permeability estimation from mercury injection capillary pressure and nuclear magnetic resonance data. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 88–89, 92–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2011.12.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2011.12.014
Robins, V., Saadatfar, M., Delgado-Friedrichs, O., & Sheppard, A. P. (2016). Percolating length scales from topological persistence analysis of micro-CT images of porous materials. Water Resources Research, 52(1), 315–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017937
Roth, S., Biswal, B., Afshar, G., Held, R. J., Øren, P.-E., Inge Berge, L., & Hilfer, R. (2011). Continuum-based rock model of a reservoir dolostone with four orders of magnitude in pore sizes. AAPG Bulletin, 95(6), 925–940. doi: https://doi.org/10.1306/12031010092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1306/12031010092
Saha Ray, S. (2013). Graph theory with algorithms and its applications: In applied science and technology. Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0750-4 [ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0750-4
Sahimi, M. (2011). Flow and transport in porous media and fractured rock: From classical methods to modern approaches (1st ed.). Wiley. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527636693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527636693
Santos, J. E., Gigliotti, A., Bihani, A., Landry, C., Hesse, M. A., Pyrcz, M. J., & Prodanović, M. (2022). MPLBM-UT: Multiphase LBM library for permeable media analysis. SoftwareX, 18, 101097. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101097
Spivey, J. P., & Lee, W. J. (2013). Applied well test interpretation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/9781613993071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/9781613993071
van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J. L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Boulogne, F., Warner, J. D., Yager, N., Gouillart, E., & Yu, T. (2014). scikit-image: Image processing in Python. PeerJ, 2, e453. doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453
Verri, I., Della Torre, A., Montenegro, G., Onorati, A., Duca, S., Mora, C. A., Radaelli, F., & Trombin, G. (2017). Development of a digital rock physics workflow for the analysis of sandstones and tight rocks. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 156, 790–800. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.053
Vogel, H. J. (1997). Morphological determination of pore connectivity as a function of pore size using serial sections. European Journal of Soil Science, 48(3), 365-377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00203.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1997.00096.x
Vogel, H.-J. (2002). Topological characterization of porous media. In K. Mecke & D. Stoyan (Eds.), Morphology of condensed matter (Vol. 600, pp. 75–92). Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45782-8_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45782-8_3
Vogel, H.-J., Weller, U., & Schlüter, S. (2010). Quantification of soil structure based on Minkowski functions. Computers & Geosciences, 36(10), 1236–1245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.007
Washburn, E. W. (1921). The dynamics of capillary flow. Physical Review, 17(3), 273–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.17.273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.17.273
Wilkinson, D., & Willemsen, J. F. (1983). Invasion percolation: A new form of percolation theory. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 16(14), 3365–3376. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/16/14/028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/16/14/028
Xu, H., Fan, Y., Hu, F., Li, C., Yu, J., Liu, Z., & Wang, F. (2019). Characterization of pore throat size distribution in tight sandstones with nuclear magnetic resonance and high-pressure mercury intrusion. Energies, 12(8), 1528. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081528
Zhang, L., Liu, J., He, X., Feng, F., Li, W., Wang, M., Zhu, W., & Zhu, Y. (2025). Fractal characteristics and influencing factors of pore structure in tight sandstone: A case study from Chang 6 Member of the Southwestern Yishan Slope. Processes, 13(4), 988. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13040988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13040988
Zhang, Y., Xiao, L., Liao, G., & Song, Y.-Q. (2016). Direct correlation of diffusion and pore size distributions with low field NMR. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 269, 196–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2016.06.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2016.06.013
Zhao, Y. (2019). Estimating critical path analysis on digital topology of the connectivity of pore media. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(1), 1165–1180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6587-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6587-z
Zheng, S., Yao, Y., Liu, D., Cai, Y., & Liu, Y. (2018). Characterizations of full-scale pore size distribution, porosity and permeability of coals: A novel methodology by nuclear magnetic resonance and fractal analysis theory. International Journal of Coal Geology, 196, 148–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.07.008
Zhu, W., Yu, W., & Chen, Y. (2012). Digital core modeling from irregular grains. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 85, 37–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.06.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.06.013